That being said, to retain all of the advantages of a networked system it would still be possible for individuals to lease licenses for project work and private study. This has already been alluded to but a usable system would need to have the tools available to group licences and groups of computers so that it was possible to allocate 20 licences to “Pro Tools Lab 1” in a single operation rather than having to move 20 licences individually. A pop-up which said something along the lines of “Your networked licence will no longer be available in 15 minutes, save your work” and then retrieve the licence from the leased machine to make it available for the booked session would be perfect. Taking things further, if this system were to be designed exactly the way I would choose, it would involve a “boot-off” process which gave fair warning to someone using a networked licence which was going to be needed for another booking.
Pace ilok license manager software#
Preferably one which can integrate with existing timetabling software so room use can be tied to licence use automatically, leaving network licenses available to any suitable machine on the network outside of timetabled use. A fee paying student will not be sympathetic if someone somewhere else on campus has leased their licence during a lab session.
It is essential to busy teaching staff, and education is the biggest potential market for this technology, that there is no possibility that the required number of seats won’t be available for a lecture. One of the advantages of per-machine licenses is that by controlling access to the machine on which the software is licensed, you also control access to the licence. It has to be possible to run it on a LAN, unlike cloud licences or Cloud Collaboration. Post-production houses are a definite potential market for networked licences but if the system requires an internet connection then it will never be adopted by security conscious post-production facilities. Here Are My Top 5 Requirements For An Ideal Networked Licence System IT departments don’t like machine authorisations. This means that there is nothing special about any particular user machine on the network and in the case of a hardware fault a new machine can be plugged in and the previous machine will magically appear on that hardware. This is inflexible and goes against the typical working method of the IT departments in large institutions where software assets are administered centrally in a networked environment.
However, they are still strictly on a one licence one machine basis. These seem to offer an alternative to the security issues associated with iLoks. Many plug-in vendors support machine authorisations. There are some pretty compelling reasons why licence servers are desirable in this environment: Physical iLoks are vulnerable to theft and securing them isn’t always easy, particularly in a Mac-based environment as, since the demise of the lockable Cheese Grater case, the option of fitting an internal USB card and locking them away isn’t possible any more. I learned a great deal about what is good and what is bad in network licence systems. This system wasn’t perfect but it was still very welcome. Quite a few years ago I was working in an educational establishment and was involved in the implementation of licence servers for applications which supported them. In this article, I am going to outline what I believe network licensing should look like and what features are important especially in an educational environment.
Pace ilok license manager pro#
With the launch of Pro Tools 2018.1 back in January 2018, Avid announced that along with support for the iLok Cloud they would be supporting iLok Networking licensing too at some point.
0 kommentar(er)
